Workload issues to be reported to Health and Safety Executive (21st January 2025)

Your Workload Working Group will contact the Health and Safety Executive with further concerns, following their dissappointing response regarding work-related stress as follows: 

Business Unit Stress Risk Assessments

Organisation Stress Risk Assessment

Freedom of Information request

Effects of Future Nottingham

Welcome back! Dispute update, ASOS info, and promotion ‘consultation’

Email sent to members on Monday 12th January

Dear members,

Welcome back, we hope you have had a restful festive season to gain some strength. And strength we will need for the tasks ahead. In this email, we want to update you on our first dispute resolution meeting with management on 9 January as well as provide further information re management’s request to provide information on ASOS and the pause to promotions.

Report from first dispute meeting

Following your overwhelming support for launching a new dispute, we have now held the first dispute meeting with the University. We expect to receive more information this week regarding the timetable for the restructure. As soon as we have this, we will share it with members.

Alongside this, we are continuing our work on preparing the indicative ballot to start on 19 January as part of the new dispute. Further information on this will follow shortly. While there is benefit in a newly framed dispute, it is also evident from our first resolution meeting that the continued threat of industrial action will be necessary to move matters forward. So far, management has rejected all our demands outright.

Reporting of ASOS

We are aware that the University of Nottingham intranet contains a form for staff to report any Action Short of a Strike (ASOS) they have participated in. We are currently seeking further clarification, as it is not yet clear exactly how the University intends to treat ASOS or what actions they will take.

If you are considering confirming participation in ASOS to the University, we strongly advise that before completing the form you:

• Ask your manager what they believe the potential impact of your actions will be, and what deductions (if any) may be made.

• Speak to your local union representative for advice.

We will update members once we have received clarification from the University. Further guidance on ASOS is also available on our website.

Promotion ‘consultation’

As we are sure you have seen, the University has taken the decision to pause the promotion process in order to ‘consult’ with the Unions about whether it should run this year while they develop their restructuring plans. We were not told of this in advance of the pause, and we made it clear that we opposed the move. We have since had two meetings to discuss it and have two more to come before the end of the consultation period on the 10th of February.

Thanks to all of you impacted by this who have submitted your feedback on the proposal, seeing it all anonymised today was very powerful and showed not just how much anger and disappointment there is, but also how united people are in their feelings. We are exploring collective ways to push back against this beyond the formal meetings, so please be in touch with your rep or the branch if you are keen to contribute.

In solidarity,

Your branch committee

The year that was

Email originally sent to members on Thursday 18th December 2025

Dear Members

A last email from 2025 from me, and what a year it has been! Your anger, your strength, and the fight back demonstrated the solidarity we have, the love we have for the Institute we believe in, the work we do tirelessly to deliver teaching, student learning, pastoral care and administration. The work we do to advance global research and knowledge, outreach activities, all make our University the place it is. Yet again we delivered all this, despite the adversities and the appalling lack of judgement from people who do not understand this or what a university is about, that it is people who make the university.

Phase 1 saw us losing amazing APM colleagues, a direct result of fiscal decisions on vanity projects and surpluses wanted by UEB. We did manage to challenge  the processes, the pooling and bumping, the Industrial action we called and participated in, which averted compulsory redundancies, legally appropriate conversations and at least decent VR payments. A loss nevertheless.  Now, the Phase 2, Strategic Change has begun, where yet again the price of everything and the value of nothing is being displayed. The choice of suspending 42 courses on flawed SSR rationale, start of performance conversations using inaccurate metrics,  and now pausing of promotions that people richly deserve, is infuriating. But the fight back continues. You saw the numerous press releases, BBC and ITN coverage, MP letters, the published SSR document that challenges the metrics and emphasises the danger of loss of QS rankings, and the financial counterproposal (AFS2). Please also find  a link here to the UCU Close Closures counter proposal, written by an amazing group of colleagues in record time so it can go to JNCC in January. https://uonucu.org/counter-proposal-to-course-suspensions/

The fight continues. Last week 97% of members at the members meeting approved the latest motion on balloting for further industrial action in 2026 if our demands are not met.  The letter, re on this, has been sent to the VC, and talks on resolving this will occur in January. It should be within 15 days of receiving official notification. However, not being the  ‘Bah Humbug” brigade, we stated we can talk in January.  

I would like to take this opportunity to thank all our Reps, our Caseworkers, our branch committee, for the amazing work they have done, supporting members, writing counter-proposals, sitting on dispute negotiation meetings, consultation/discussion meetings on the various policies University wants to take, and producing alternate excellent counter-proposals in record time, to try and avert this disaster to our university and colleagues livelihoods. I would like to thank all our members for showing support, being there at the picket lines, rallies, your speeches, the  ” singers in the courtyards and lawns!”, all showing the solidarity we have and the fight back.   (Please see below some images, that we leave behind for history). 

Please do have a lovely festive break, enjoy the company of your nearest and dearest. Come back in January 2026, ready for the push back and the climb down we expect from UEB.  We will call a meeting in January to get your approval on some key new things we plan to do. 

Yours,

Lopa

Image
Nottingham
A photo of members and students at a UCU rally
A photo of musicians playing on the Trent building's yard
Image
A photo of a crowd at a rally

 

Image
A photo of Jo Grady speaking into a megaphone in front of a UoN UCU banner
Image
Image
Image
A photo of a group of people holding up UCU banners and signs
Image
A photo of people at a rally with signs that say "UCU says NO compulsory redundancies"

UCU report on the use of SSR in Phase 2 Rightsizing – critical modelling results and implications for institutional risk

Full report on “rightsizing” and SSR

This report was shared with council and UEB members in response to the University’s use of Student–Staff Ratio (SSR) as the central tool for “rightsizing” in Phase 2 of Future Nottingham.

The analysis reflects input from specialist data staff within the University and includes dedicated mathematical modelling conducted by academic experts. We want to highlight several findings of immediate relevance to Council’s oversight of institutional risk.

1. SSR is not an appropriate rightsizing metric.

It is a crude headcount ratio that does not reflect real teaching capacity, discipline-specific demands, accreditation requirements, or research commitments. Applying a blanket SSR target of 18–22 would severely damage laboratory-based and research-intensive subjects and move several Schools outside the norms of any research-intensive comparator group.

2. Our modelling shows severe impacts on international rankings.

Using two independent approaches,  we find that raising SSR to around 20 would drop Nottingham by roughly 25 places in the QS World Rankings, taking the University from 97th to around 122nd, even under the most conservative assumptions.

A sector-wide shift does not protect Nottingham: even if all UK institutions moved to SSR 20, Nottingham still falls to around 120th—a mitigation of only two places.

These results already assume minimal negative effects and include modelling of peer stabilisation favoured by QS. More realistic models, which account for reduced research time and consequent decline in citations and reputation, show substantially worse outcomes over time. 

3. National rankings are similarly affected.

We project a fall from 51st in the Guardian league table to roughly 74–119, depending on SSR level and the extent of knock-on effects on teaching satisfaction, continuation and career outcomes.

4. Raising tariffs cannot offset these declines.

To maintain our current Guardian position while increasing SSR, average entry tariff would need to rise to around 200–210 points—higher than those of the most selective universities in the UK. This is not achievable in Nottingham’s recruitment market.

Using SSR as the primary instrument for rightsizing is worrying. The risks to the University’s research profile, student experience, domestic competitiveness and—in particular—international reputation and recruitment are extremely high. We strongly recommend that SSR not be used as a sizing tool without a full, institutionally led modelling exercise of the reputational and financial consequences.

Of course, we are happy to discuss this further and to share the data files and scripts used in the modelling.

Call for Action and Strike Info

Email sent to members on Wednesday 23rd July 2025. Minor edits have been made from the original.

Dear Members,

It was excellent to see nearly 200 of you at our meeting, and thank you to everyone who spoke – whether on mic or via the chat. It was fantastic to hear your energy, care and solidarity.

This email is to provide a summary of where things stand for our branch and dispute, and information about our upcoming strike action, our plans for pickets tomorrow, and action short of a strike.

There is a lot of information to summarise here, so it is inevitably quite long – please use the headings to guide you and please do read to the end. 

Meeting summary and next steps 

At our branch meeting yesterday afternoon, we discussed our plans for strike action tomorrow (Thursday 24th) and Action Short of a Strike in the light of the latest news on Phase 1 of Future Nottingham.

A running theme was the widespread discontent, anger is a better word, over the running of Phase 1 and the ongoing refusal to rule out even at this late stage the use of compulsory redundancy. 

A vote was held and the meeting decided to continue with the strike action and ASOS called two weeks ago. 

The call for solidarity with our APM members, friends and colleagues from the meeting was loud and clear. As was the recognition that this is an opportunity to demonstrate our resolve and strength of feeling ahead of Phase 2 in the autumn. We look forward to seeing all who can join us on the picket lines!

Participation in the strike

When it comes to industrial action, all members are expected to participate as part of the collective responsibility that comes with union membership. 

However, if you have accepted a VR offer (please see advice from UCU regional office below), are on annual leave, research leave, field research or attending a conference on the day of the strike and cannot take part, we strongly encourage you to show solidarity with your friends and colleagues by donating 50% of your day’s salary to the hardship fund:

UCU Nottingham LA63 Hardship Fund
Account number: 20346359
Sort code: 60-83-01

For both strike action and ASOS, line managers are likely to ask staff to declare participation in advance. Some have already asked this in all staff emails. Please remember however that we are required to declare participation after returning to work, not in advance. If in doubt, talk to your department rep or contact the branch committee. 

Picketing – let us know you’re coming!

As our strike day on Thursday takes place on a day of graduation ceremonies, with cars arriving and leaving campus much of the day. West and North entrances of University Park will be especially busy – and our dispute can be made highly visible. 

Therefore, we will hold a picket at University Park West Entrance from 8am until 3pm. (The Beeston roundabout.) We ask that you join us for a few hours, if you are able to, as part of your strike action. Please let us know when you are coming by using this form. This will help us plan for tomorrow!

We have a number of signs, leaflets, arm bands, and UCU branded paraphernalia, but essential to any picket are the placards picketers make and bring! Whistles, drums, maracas, vuvuzelas, and pots to bang are all welcome too – as are any snacks you want to share! 

ASOS fundamentals

For guidance and frequently asked questions about ASOS, please see the ASOS Fundamentals page of our branch website noted in last week’s newsletter. We are updating this as people ask new questions, so do ask your reps or the branch committee!

New to industrial action or to picketing?

A ‘picketing for beginners guide’ has been added to the branch website.

Our branch was last out on strike in 2023. Many of you will be experienced in HE industrial disputes, pickets and ASOS from the USS and Four Fights campaigns. Many of you will also be new to the branch or to participating in strike action. The first thing to know is that our picket lines, in contrast to how they may be portrayed in the media and in pop culture, are friendly places. 

While we protest and call attention to the serious failings of our employer, picket lines are places of positivity. We stand in solidarity with colleagues we would not ordinarily speak to and feel part of an academic community. Whether it is philosophical discussions on what the university should be, picket line dogs, honks of solidarity, kids starting their union training early, there is loads of excitement to be had. So join us for however long you are able! 

In that spirit, we recognise that picket lines are not equally accessible to all. Whether that is because you have caring responsibilities, are a disabled member of the union, or otherwise face barriers. No member of the branch should ever feel they are the lesser when their strike action does not include picketing. As long as you withdraw your labour for the day, you are making an important contribution! Feel free to reach out to fellow members to feel some solidarity as you strike away from campus, or reach out to someone you know can’t be there.

Regional UCU advice for staff taking VR

We have received advice from UCU regional legal advisors that members who have a voluntary redundancy agreement agreed or signed off may put their settlement agreement at risk if they strike. We therefore recommend that those members do not strike, but contribute to the strike fund instead (details above). If you are in this position and wish to visit the pickets on the day to talk with colleagues and express support, know you are welcome. 

Workload pressures 

APM members in our meeting made it clear that the loss of colleagues through VR is already causing significant workload issues and work-related stress. The branch workload group will be organising a meeting soon for APM members to discuss how to record this impact and hold the university to account to ensure that staff wellbeing is protected. 

Closing reflections: Solidarity with APM is Solidarity to all

The actions of the University in recent months have seen many new members join our Branch at Nottingham. All members are important to our action and having the backs of our administrative, library, and IT colleagues is vital. Whilst research and teaching staff constitute the majority of UCU members, APM staff are essential to the university – and across all job grades APM staff have been targeted first (and will be targeted again). Phase 2 is coming soon and our academic colleagues will need our action again. 

For now, it is therefore essential that we stand together – at the picket line tomorrow if you are able – to make the biggest impression we can on management, and to show our solidarity with our dear APM colleagues. Together we are a formidable force.

Looking forward to seeing you on the picket lines!

In solidarity,

Will Patterson (Picket Lead) and Lopa Leach 

(On behalf of branch committee).