Update on negotiations: clear progress but today’s meeting postponed

Dear members,

Apologies for the short notice but we wanted to update you on the negotiation meeting we just had with management. They clearly understood your anger and that the previous offer wasn’t enough to convince people to stand down anything. They also clearly grasp the time-sensitivity of marks coming in for accredited modules and that staff can’t be expected to drop everything/overrule annual leave to turn round marks in an unrealistic timeframe. 

In particular we spoke about: the need for a much better offer on pay deductions, improvements on the enhanced VR offer, and a clear commitment around course closures. This was understood and we are hopeful there is room for movement on all of these, and that, as a consequence, we could prevent compulsory redundancies.

However, given the need for a significantly improved offer, they have said they won’t be able to get anything to us in time for the proposed 11.30 meeting, so as a consequence we have made the decision not to run the meeting and give you some time back in your day. (Committee members also have another three hours of union meetings today so we need to preserve our energy as well as yours!)

They are hopeful they can get an offer to us on Thursday or Friday, and as soon as they have we will pass it on to you for consideration and we will sort an emergency members meeting to vote on it.

Sorry again for the last minute change, but I hope this is all clear. Do be in touch if you have any specific questions and we also have our Zoom coffee morning on Friday at 10 for any further points you want to raise.

In solidarity as always,

Today’s members’ meeting and A Bold New Era for Nothingham United FC!

Email sent to members on Wednesday 1st July 2026. Zoom details redacted for security.

Dear UCU members,

First, please remember today’s members’ meeting at 11.30 a.m. If there is a new, improved offer by management resulting from this morning’s dispute resolution meeting, we will hold another vote. The Zoom details are as follows:

REDACTED

Second as part of our campaign to defend jobs and working conditions at the University of Nottingham, we will be sending regular emails, authored by different UCU members, examining key elements of management’s restructuring plans. Today we have another, more light-hearted intervention. Feel free to share this post with non-UCU members in your area.

A Bold New Era for Nothingham United FC

By Nigel Stratton-Worthington, Senior chief football strategist. 

At Nothingham United FC, we have always believed that football clubs must look beyond the narrow, outdated objective of winning football matches. While some organisations remain trapped in twentieth-century thinking, obsessing over league position, trophies, player recruitment and other legacy metrics, we have embraced a modern vision focused on sustainability, transformation and property acquisition.

This journey began with our landmark purchase of the Central Plaza Retail Complex. Critics questioned why a football club with an existing club shop, a successful online store, and merchandise sales across multiple channels would require a large city-centre retail development. The answer is simple: Vision.

Unfortunately, after purchasing the complex and investing heavily in renovations, club-branded décor, executive suites, strategic consultation exercises and a state-of-the-art stakeholder engagement atrium, we discovered that we had rather less money than anticipated. Some observers have described the resulting £65 million loss as “catastrophic.” We prefer the term “transformational.”

Indeed, the true measure of leadership is not avoiding expensive mistakes but responding boldly once they have occurred. Consequently, the Board commissioned a comprehensive review of club operations. This revealed a troubling statistic: our Spectator-to-Staff Ratio (SSR) was below target.

Naturally, this finding demanded immediate action. Some traditionalists suggested increasing spectator numbers. Others proposed improving team performance. A few extremists even advocated investing in players. However, careful analysis demonstrated that reducing staff numbers would be significantly easier.

Accordingly, we have launched Project Lean Pitch. The principle is straightforward. Every employee contributes equally to football operations. Whether an individual is a first-team striker, goalkeeper, groundskeeper, academy coach, bus driver or tea-room assistant, each count as precisely one member of staff. This robust methodology allows us to identify efficiencies wherever they exist. Importantly, senior management have been excluded from consideration. As the review concluded, strategic leadership is critical to the future success of the club and therefore cannot be reduced. The same regrettably cannot be said for centre-backs.

Following extensive modelling, we have determined that the optimal football squad consists of eight players. This represents a significant efficiency gain over the previous, wasteful eleven-player model. While some have raised concerns regarding FIFA regulations, positional coverage and basic geometry, we believe these objections reflect an outdated attachment to conventional football thinking. Indeed, our modelling shows that fewer players will create exciting opportunities for innovation, agility and personal resilience. Each remaining player will gain valuable experience covering multiple positions simultaneously. This aligns perfectly with our commitment to professional development.

The financial savings generated through these measures will enable investment in several strategic priorities. Most notably, we are delighted to announce plans for a new Executive Wellness and Leadership Medical Centre. The facility will feature private treatment rooms, a strategic recovery suite, leadership resilience pods and an inspirational glass atrium celebrating our transformation journey. Healthy leadership is vital during periods of change.

As for supporters concerned about the future of the first team, I would encourage them to focus on the bigger picture. Football matches come and go. League tables fluctuate. Relegation is temporary. But retail property acquisitions, strategic transformation programmes and executive wellness infrastructure create lasting value. That is why Nothingham United FC remains committed to delivering sustainable excellence for generations to come. Results on the pitch are, of course, only one measure of success. And fortunately, not one we plan to monitor.

             On behalf of the Branch Committee

Dispute resolution offer

Email sent to members on Friday 26th June 2026. Zoom links omitted. Attachments embedded as links in text.

Dear members

Thank you for all the work you are doing to stop the proposed job losses (700 redundancies in FN2, with CR if they don’t get the VR), course closures,  reduced research time and SSR (one fits all disciplines philosophy). Your efforts are working, both the very effective MAB, and the various conversations you and we are having with local MPS, Councillors, newspapers (Times Higher, Nottingham Post), television (BBC, ITN, Channel 4), radio (BBC Nottingham ) and of course UCU press. These resulted in letters from MPs to VC, Public Statements of concern and  questions raised in Parliament. We do have support of students, anxious about graduating  correctly. 

We went to a dispute resolution meeting on 18 June, where VC/UEB  agreed to look at our proposals and solutions.  Jane has replied, see above. They have organised a second meeting on this. This will be on Wednesday (1 July).  Please peruse the  long letter (and Appendix)  Jane wrote, attached, where she spells out her thoughts, the next steps  in the business case, and asks for MAB to be stopped in time for students to graduate. The branch committee has met today, to discuss this, and we have sent her a response, stating why the concessions detailed were inadequate. We have re-iterated our asks and have sent her our UCU Counterproposal Part 2.  

Before we go in on 1 July, we want your opinion on all this, and on the next steps you wish to take. We want you to come to two meetings : The first is on Monday (29 June), where we can take your opinion on the current offer and valued suggestions to take to the second dispute negotiation meeting scheduled  for the Wednesday morning. At our UCU meeting, we will also take a vote on management’s proposal, either the one outlined in the VC’s letter or an improved version of that.

We have also organised a branch meeting with you straight after the dispute meeting; to relate any proposed changes they offer, take your vote, and discuss the next steps in our dispute. (Please find the Zoom links to both meetings below.)

Do come, let us stop this awful FN2 that will damage our university irreversibly.

In solidarity, sadness, anger and fight-back spirit,

    Lopa, on behalf of branch committee.

PS. The donations from other UCU branches have been brilliant! Amazing Solidarity, we are now legendary! Unfortunately we are also a university fighting back the highest number of redundancies in HE.  I am sure our Treasurer will let you know how much has been amassed in the hardship fund, and how we can increase payouts, etc

Updated MAB and strike advice

Email sent to members on Monday 22nd June 2026.

Dear members,

Over the last week, the Department Reps network has identified a number of questions and scenarios for members participating in the Marking and Assessment Boycott. Whilst the situation varies across the 28 academic schools, and between courses within a single school, there are some relatively common features to what we are seeing reported. 

This email is an attempt to summarise what is known at this stage of our dispute and the University’s assessment cycle, and provide broad guidance for UoN UCU members in relation to participation in the MAB and/or strike action. It cannot speak to all possible scenarios and as the context at the University changes, it may prove necessary to update this guidance. 

Wider position of the UoN UCU Branch after 15th June marking deadline

    1. Strike action and Action Short of a Strike (ASOS), including the Marking and Assessment Boycott (MAB), remain in place until 31st July or until the Branch decides otherwise, for example in response to an acceptable offer from the Vice Chancellor and UEB.
    2. After June 15th, we note clear communications in some Schools that further marks are not required for Registry, including for work still unmarked due to the MAB. 
    3. In other Schools the contingency regulations cannot be universally applied (e.g. due to accreditation requirements) and therefore marking duties have not been withdrawn.
    4. Where marking continues to be required, the MAB should continue. This also applies to moderation of marked work (see item 11). 
    5. Those members who no longer have assessment duties cannot, for the moment, participate in the MAB. In these areas where management has indicated marks are no longer required, deductions for participation in the MAB appear likely to end on June 15th. 
    6. There is an upcoming window from mid-July when students may reject ‘part for whole’ and ‘derived marks’ produced by the Contingency Regulations where no actual mark exists. When students reject such made up marks, members may find they are asked to provide an actual mark. At this stage, members should return to participating in the MAB.
    7. It continues to be an expectation that all members participate in disruptive industrial action that brings management into meaningful negotiations on the terms of our dispute. As some members return to work under ASOS, they must take care to act in solidarity and neither accidentally nor purposefully undermine the industrial action of others.
    8. To summarise, the 15th June deadline covers a significant portion of assessment related work but not all of it. The MAB, wider ASOS and strike authorisation remain in place so that members with marking duties are not obliged to complete this work and continue the disruption that puts pressure on the University to negotiate.
    9. It remains in the Vice Chancellor and UEB’s power to bring this dispute and the disruption from our industrial action to an end.

What does this mean for UCU members?

    1. If member has been explicitly told they have no assessment related work to complete, they can consider their participation in the MAB at an end for the time being. If the status of your assessment related work hasn’t been communicated to you, talk to your UCU Rep
    2. Regarding moderation, where actual marks exist members should not provide verification of the marking process by completing the paperwork. However, if asked to complete moderation paperwork for a module where no marking has occurred due to the MAB, members should record that no actual marks exist and submit the paperwork accordingly, ensuring the relevant Exam Boards are formally notified. 
    3. If a member is asked directly about their past or present participation in the MAB, they should answer honestly. Being asked directly includes emails addressed to you specifically. It does not include where the request is one item amongst others in an all-staff email (see specific UCU guidance on this from the branch here and national here). 
    4. As with strike action, no one should declare their future participation as the action has yet to happen, and it may get called off if a deal is reached. 
    5. Members should keep in mind that wider ASOS remains in place (e.g. not covering for absent colleagues, working to hours, full list accessible here) .
    6. If assessment work is allocated to a member or required by a line manager (e.g. moderation activities, or marking work where students rejected a derived or part-for-whole mark), members should refuse on the grounds that they are taking part in ASOS/MAB, and/or return to strike action to prevent being required to work for free. 
    7. Members may remain on strike entirely whilst the authorisation for strike action is in place. 
    8. When members receive their June payslip showing evidence of pay deductions for industrial action (the payslip can be downloaded as a pdf from UniCore), they should apply to the UCU national Fighting Fund in the first instance, then to the local branch solidarity fund (details of how to apply to be shared nearer to payslip publication). 
    9. If you have questions related to the above, speak to your Department Rep. If you do not have a Department Rep, contact the Branch Committee: uonucubranch@gmail.com 

In solidarity,

Dream job?

Email sent to members on Monday 22nd June 2026.

As part of our campaign to defend jobs and working conditions at the University of Nottingham, we will be sending regular emails, authored by different UCU members, examining key elements of management’s restructuring plans. Today we discuss the enormous toll that management’s restructuring plans and simple incompetence have taken on staff. Feel free to share this post with non-UCU members in your area.

I’ve been employed in my role here for less than a year. So far Nottingham have accidently sacked me, put me at risk of redundancy, and potentially lost my personal data to cybercriminals

Just over a year ago I was about to graduate with my PhD and start what I thought was my dream job. I felt so lucky to have quickly secured a permanent academic post at a Russell Group University and was excited for the year ahead. 

Since then, the University of Nottingham have accidently sacked me, put me at risk of redundancy, and potentially lost my personal data to cybercriminals.

Back in September 2025, during the first week of teaching, I received an email telling me that my account was going to be closed that evening, as I was leaving the University. This email arrived shortly before 3pm in the afternoon, just I was heading into a medical appointment. I had no idea what this was about, and as a new member of staff, was somewhat panicked that there may have been an issue with my contract. 

It was not until the next day, when I managed to get hold of HR on the phone, that I learned there had been a mistake in the system, and I had incorrectly been processed as a leaver. I was told that they ‘thought’ they could reverse this, and without it affecting my tax, as ‘fortunately’ we had just entered a new pay cycle. To be fair, at this point the University did confirm with me almost immediately that the leavers process had been reversed, and I was back on my account later that day. However, it was not until several months later that it was confirmed that my tax had not been impacted, and as a new member of staff, the whole ordeal had quite an impact on me. 

Then, on the 12th May of this year, I received an email placing my role at risk of redundancy. I’m still not sure what the pool I have been placed in actually looks like, as the numbers on my letter and the University documents do not match. As with many others placed at risk, this has had a significant impact on my self-worth, sense of security and stability, and my initial sense of pride at working for the University of Nottingham has rapidly waned. It has been incredibly difficult to continue to function, turn up to work, and provide the kind of experience, support and presence of mind that I want to give my students. 

Most recently, on the 10th June, I received an email from the University letting me know that my data had potentially been accessed by cybercriminals the previous day. I am currently enrolled at the University as a student, as well as a staff member, which is why my data was included in the breach. The email informed us that cybercriminals had potentially accessed our contact information, University details, financial information, and personal information. For me, this includes private medical information. The advice provided was to change our passwords and monitor our accounts for suspicious activity. When I attempted to call IT Services to change my passwords (which students cannot do independently) it was not possible to get through. 

This data breach has been even more worrying for me due to security risks in my personal life, with my address needing to be kept confidential. 

Last year I thought I’d secured my dream job, but so far it has felt like one crisis after another. Looking forward to the coming year, I feel more dread than optimism.  

An indebted thank you to, and solidarity with, colleagues from across the University who are currently participating in industrial action at great personal cost. And to those who are not currently out on strike, a reminder to say no to and to continue to resist requests that undermine the action of colleagues who have withdrawn their labour to save our University! 

      On behalf of the Branch Committee