e-ballot results and updates

Dear Members

We now have the results from our indicative e-ballot, which closed on Friday. Thank you to all those who have voted: the overwhelming result on a massive turn out is that a clear majority are willing to take action in support of protecting jobs and livelihoods of people at our university.  So heart-warming, thank you, wonderful people. These results mean we can now seek authorisation from our national union to actually ballot.  It is vital you vote in that ballot if it is authorised, again in numbers that the university cannot possibly ignore!  The ballot will again have the 2 Qs on type of action: Strikes and Action Short of a Strike, starting from late July of this academic year (covering Phase 1 of FN) and autumn term of next academic year (when Phase 2 kicks in and CR of Phase 1 is finalised). The ballot paper, on defending jobs at UoN, will detail the types of ASOS which we may call upon you to take, these were identified from the many conversations members had with reps and committee. 

A few further updates and recaps for you: 

As you know, in March, UCU members voted to declare a dispute with the University because the VC refused to rule out compulsory redundancies. During a brief dispute resolution period with us,  VC/UEB would not step back from the planned redundancies. 

Phase 1 update: On 8 April, 2025, management announced Phase 1 of Future Nottingham, involving 258 FTE redundancies of APM staff,  equivalent to 387 roles. These are, in the first instance potentially voluntary, but if need be also includes compulsory redundancies. Voluntary redundancy is being pushed for, at all levels of APM, in professional services and in schools, although the bigger changes (centralisation)  and compulsory redundancies will tip into Phase 2. Beyond not understanding why sending VR letters to all APM staff would cause them to be hugely and unnecessarily saddened (!), roles considered for CR are being published in departments group meetings leading to people in those roles being known more widely as being targeted (unacceptable). Structural changes are not being properly disclosed to the TU negotiating teams (for UCU they are: P, VP, APM Officer & Regional BA ) and some extensive restructuring such as External Relations and CARO, have not been shared properly with Unions or staff.  The risk level of the changes is not being provided nor is why these exact roles are being considered for CR. We are, therefore, strongly contesting their understanding of when the official consultation period has started, it has not! 

Additionally, management have directly said services those people provide to the University will suffer, or others (APM or Academics) may have to pick up (ahm! Workload!! 100% is 100%!).

Phase 2 Update: Plans are already being drawn up and presume will be concluded by the month of May, re which degrees, which research is deemed financially unviable, without understanding what will be lost re knowledge advance and education.  It is highly likely that similar levels of redundancies for academics and technicians will be imposed, again based on top-down analyses rather than involvement of the stakeholders who deliver all the teaching and research. The implications to our UK and global rankings are huge.

We remain of the firm opinion that these cuts are neither necessary nor are they solely externally enforced, considering local financial mismanagement around vanity projects such as Castle Meadow Campus.

We will continue having the regular weekly meetings with management about their plans of implementing redundancies and challenging their vision of a shrinking U of Nottingham. In these meetings, it has also become clear that sustained industrial action is needed to sway management’s strategy.

Unison are also seeking mandate to go into Industrial Dispute, so we may have both unions on strike together. We also plan to hold a very visible 3 union rally soon, to show total solidarity, we will inform on dates. 

In solidarity

Lopa (P), Andrew (APM officer), Andreas (V-P)

On behalf of UoNUCU Branch Committee

Motions passed at AGM 30th April 2025

The following motions were passed at the recent AGM;

Motion 1: New progressive pay structure for highest earners to protect jobs at UoN

Motion 2: No 120 percent workload at UoN!

Motion 3: Support a Trade Dispute with the Secretary of Education over funding

In addition, the nominees for next years committee were confirmed

Finally the branch approved one amendment to motion SFC7 scheduled for debate at Congress. The amendment is as follows;

“Insert following resolve i.

ii. Working with relevant specialist committees, review all officer role job descriptions and the use of language throughout the model branch rules to ensure they reflects current equality strands and language. For example, insert ‘migrant members’ in the enumeration of equality groups in bullet iv) under 8.6 Equality Officer.

And renumber accordingly.”

AGM reminder and new emergency motion on workload

Email sent to members on Monday 28th April 2025. Content has been modified slightly for the purposes of this post.

Dear Member,

Thanks so much to all of you who came along to the inaugural Agnes Flues memorial lecture on Thursday. We had a fantastic turnout and a great talk from Mick Lynch. If you would like to see some photos take a look at this link here.

AGM reminder and new motion

I am just writing with a final reminder about Wednesday’s AGM, as well as an additional emergency motion surrounding workload that has been put forward by the branch committee. As you will know our excellent workload campaign has made some really significant strides of late, but there are some concerning new developments about expectations that workloads can be regularly as high as 120%, something that will only be made worse with potential redundancies caused by Future Nottingham. This motion addresses that.

Congress and nominee update

Beyond the motion there are also two small additions, one is an updated and now correct list of nominees for next year, and the other relates to Congress. Branch Committee have received and endorsed one amendment to a motion scheduled for debate at Congress. In line with our branch rules, a vote by the membership is required on whether to submit this amendment on behalf of the branch. Please find the full text below ahead of discussion at the AGM:

Amendment to SFC7

“Insert following resolve i.

ii. Working with relevant specialist committees, review all officer role job descriptions and the use of language throughout the model branch rules to ensure they reflects current equality strands and language. For example, insert ‘migrant members’ in the enumeration of equality groups in bullet iv) under 8.6 Equality Officer.

And renumber accordingly.”

I have also attached a slightly updated agenda which now includes the new emergency motion and the zoom link for your convenience.

Hope to see you on Wednesday.

Nick (Branch Secretary)

UCU UoN is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: UCU UoN AGM
Time: Apr 30, 2025 13:00 London
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88616322843?pwd=R2XekibdbDSSh4Iglw3HbWFYXLTvvd.1

Meeting ID: 886 1632 2843
Passcode: 929647

AGM Agenda – Wednesday 30th April 1.00 – 2.30

  1. Welcome and introduction (Lopa Leach – President)
  2. Branch Committee membership 2025/26 (Nick Clare – Secretary)
  3. President’s report on 2024/25 (Lopa Leach – President)
  4. Treasurer’s report on 2024/25 (Tony Padilla – Treasurer)
  5. Debate and vote on Motion 1: “New progressive pay structure for highest earners to protect jobs at UoN” (attached)
  6. Debate and vote on Motion 2: “No 120 per cent workload at UoN!” (attached)
  7. Debate and vote on Motion 3: ”Support a Trade Dispute with Secretary of State for Education over Funding” (attached)
  8. Congress preparation
  9. Any Other Business

Motion 1: “New progressive pay structure for highest earners to protect jobs at UoN”

Motion 2: “No 120 per cent workload at UoN!”

Motion 3: ”Support a Trade Dispute with Secretary of State for Education over Funding”

UCU has reported UoN to HSE re: workload and stress prevention breaches

Email sent to members on Friday 21st March 2025

Dear members

We wanted to let you know that after asking for stress prevention documentation for several months, the UCU Branch Committee made the decision to report UoN to HSE for workload and stress breaches. Below is the summary of what we told HSE:

  • Already over 30 requests for caseworker support this year, a sharp increase to the comparative time period in previous years.
  • High levels of “stress and worry regarding work” identified in the 2023-4 Specialist Wellbeing Services report.
  • Failure to produce stress risk assessment and business unit level stress risk assessments despite repeated requests from September 2024.
  •  A sloppy and hastily completed Institution Level Risk Assessment finally shared last week, without any dialogue with UCU.  It is inadequate as it needs to be supported by Business Unit Stress Risk Assessments, which are not in place. It includes Future Nottingham as a stress mitigating factor.
  • UCU workload reps were told that risk assessments have been delayed due to workload issues amongst administrative and professional staff
  • Most academic staff have a “workload model” which in many cases is calculated as over 100% i.e. a staff member contracted to work full time is required to complete more work than can be expected within their contracted hours. Within university policy, workload up to 120% is considered within normal range, with no rationale for this, despite numerous requests.
  • There is no evidence of equality impact assessment for workload models and no mitigations put in place for disabled colleagues, exacerbating increased vulnerability to stress.                 

The UCU branch considers that there is substantial unmitigated risk to workload-related health. The branch is also concerned by an anticipated increase in the number and severity of cases of work-related stress, stress-related ill health and serious mental health problems among employees.

We will keep you posted on developments with HSE. In the meantime, if you are struggling with work-related stress, ask your line manager for an Individual Stress Risk Assessment. Please come to the weekly workload support drop-ins, for advice and guidance on just saying ‘no!’ to unsustainable workloads. Check the weekly branch newsletter for dates and times of these. We will be in touch soon to ask for testimonials on your workload and stress experiences. You are not on your own with this. 

Your Workload Working Group

UoN UCU Motions for 2025 UCU Congress

The following motions were passed with large majorities by members at the well-attended meeting on Wednesday 12th March.

Motions for Congress

1. Reporting back of NEC members to constituencies

Congress instructs the NEC to formulate rule change motions to ensure
the following:

  1. NEC members canvass opinions from branches and regions in their
    constituencies prior to NEC and NEC subcommittee meetings.
  2. NEC members produce a written report within two working weeks of
    NEC and NEC subcommittees to be circulated in the appropriate
    constituency.
  3. Appropriate mechanisms to be established by UCU to support
    circulation of reports from NEC members to constituencies.

Rule Change Motions for Congress

2. Change to Rule 16

Add new rule 16.5.1

Where National Congress or Sector Conferences do not meet during the times referred to in rule 16.5, the relevant National Congress or Sector Conferences must be recalled as soon as reasonably practicable to consider the motions submitted to the National Congress or Sector Conferences. Additional late and emergency motions can be considered at the recalled Congress or Sector Conference in line with rules 16.8 and 16.9.

Purpose:
To enshrine in rule that in the event of cancellation, Congress or Sector Conference need to be rescheduled. Rather than, as has happened when the rules were silent on the matter, motions disappear into a void in spite of the hard work submitting bodies undertook to compose them and the efforts of elected delegates to prepare to debate them.

3. Change to regional committee standing orders –
Environmental Representative

To Standing order 7 of the UCU Regional Committee Model Standing Orders, add ‘an Environmental representative’ after ‘a representative of members on casual contracts’

So the amended Model Standing Order 7 would read:

Treasurer, the Secretary and the Chairs and Secretaries of the sector committees, and for each sector, a representative of members on casual contracts, an Environmental representative together with such other Officers as may be deemed necessary.

Purpose:
The importance of environmental issues and the seriousness of climate change means that there should be an Environmental representative on regional committees. The rule change will add one.